[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FCC92EC.2000808@parallels.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:50:20 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: menu: use nr_running instead of cpuload for
calculating perf mult
On 06/04/2012 02:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:24 +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> rq->cpuload strongly depends on cgroup hierarchy. For example, if hundreds of
>> tasks are running inside cpu:/test cgroup, the sum of cpuload over all cpus
>> won't exceed 1024 (by default). That makes the cpuidle menu governor take wrong
>> decisions, which can negatively affect overall performance.
>>
>> To cope this, use nr_running last seen in __update_cpu_load() instead of
>> cpuload for calculating performance multiplier.
> What is cpuidle trying to do?
Basing on cpuload, it selects idle state. The less the load, the lowest
the state.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists