[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120604021839.GB26319@zhy>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:18:40 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] smpboot: Provide a generic method to boot
secondary processors
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:52:23PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> In short, to avoid breaking build on x86.
> We wanted to follow the x86 convention of having static inline functions in
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h and use the smp_ops structure to route the calls
> to x86 or xen as appropriate (see patch 4 in this series).
>
> But __weak definitions interfere with that and break the build. Hence, we
> followed what Linus suggested doing in a similar context:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/26/187
Good to know that, thanks for your explanation.
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists