[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120604152522.GE26651@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:55:22 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Prashanth Nageshappa <prashanth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
roland@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: balance_cpu to consider other cpus in its group
as target of (pinned) task migration
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2012-06-04 17:21:11]:
> That is not to say you couldn't contrive a scenario where it would be
> needed..
Right ..what if B0. B1 are pinned? !! I think most of the current
weakness lies in handling tasks that have affinity set.
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists