[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206042158200.3086@ionos>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:01:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
bp@...64.org, x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel
machines
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Chen Gong wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Ensure that the timer is firing in @interval from now.
> > + */
> > +void mce_timer_kick(unsigned long interval)
> > +{
> > + struct timer_list *t = &__get_cpu_var(mce_timer);
> > + unsigned long when = jiffies + interval;
> > + unsigned long iv = __this_cpu_read(mce_next_interval);
> > +
> > + if (time_before(when, t->expires) && timer_pending(t)) {
> > + mod_timer(t, when);
> > + } else if (!mce_next_interval) {
>
> Why using mce_next_interval, it is a per_cpu var, should be non-NULL
> definitely, right? How about using *iv* here?
iv is the thing to use. No idea why I typoed mce_next_interval into
that.
> > + t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + iv);
> > + add_timer_on(t, smp_processor_id());
> > + }
> > + if (interval < iv)
> > + __this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, iv);
> > }
>
> This code should be __this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, interval);?
Duh, yes.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists