[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <138EA028228D124A900F5E6746F3C216286EAA65@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:11:01 +0000
From: "Zou, Yi" <yi.zou@...el.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@....if.uj.edu.pl>,
"Love, Robert W" <robert.w.love@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
"devel@...n-fcoe.org" <devel@...n-fcoe.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Different WARNING:
drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.o(.init.text+0x1a): Section mismatch in reference
from the function init_module() to the function
.exit.text:fcoe_transport_exit()
>
> > However, fcoe_transport_exit() is called only in module *exit* path by
> the
> > module exit func libfcoe_exit(), not in the init_module error path. Let
> me
> > take a objdump of the libfcoe.o to see where your above section
> mismatch warning
> > is from. Is this on 32bit only?
>
> static int __init libfcoe_init(void)
> {
> int rc = 0;
>
> rc = fcoe_transport_init();
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> rc = fcoe_sysfs_setup();
> if (rc)
> fcoe_transport_exit(); <=============
>
> return rc;
> }
>
> It is called from __init context here.
>
>
>
>
> static void __exit libfcoe_exit(void)
> {
> fcoe_sysfs_teardown();
> fcoe_transport_exit(); <==============
> }
>
> And from __exit context here.
> This is -rc1.
>
> Sam
Ah...haven't pulled the rc1 yet, which was why I did not see the this.
Anyway, yeah you are right, dropping __exit should fix the problem.
thanks,
yi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists