[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87aa0j3lhw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:07:47 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:15:25 +0800, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 06:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> >> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>>> s/return/Returns
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for comments!
> >>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't
> >>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set.
> >>>> So something like:
> >>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style.
> >>> Is the following new update patch ok?
> >>
> >>
> >> Any further comments for this patch? :)
> >
> > Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Does someone like to pick up this patch? :)
Applied, thanks!
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists