[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120605103846.GQ23408@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:38:46 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>,
Mattias WALLIN <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect
Device Tree
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:31:24AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 01/06/12 09:48, Mark Brown wrote:
> >What makes you say the two are equivalent? The former is a reference
> >from a consumer device to a named regulator while the latter is a
> >reference from a regulator to a named consumer.
> I mean they both link regulator<->consumer and apply the name "vmmc"
> to the supply, or am I missing something / getting confused?
You're missing something - note what I say above about the direction the
mapping is done in, and consider what happens if we've got two of the
same PMIC down in a system.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists