[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FCDE270.1020906@cesarb.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 07:41:52 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: frontswap: is frontswap_init called from swapoff safe?
I was looking at the swapfile.c parts of the recently-merged frontswap,
and noticed that frontswap_init can be called from swapoff when
try_to_unuse fails.
This looks odd to me. Whether it is safe or not depends on what
frontswap_ops.init does, but the comment for __frontswap_init ("Called
when a swap device is swapon'd") and the function name itself seem to
imply it should be called only for swapon, not when relinking the
swap_info after a failed swapoff.
In particular, if frontswap_ops.init assumes the swap map is empty, it
would break, since as far as I know when try_to_unuse fails there are
still pages in the swap.
(By the way, the comment above enable_swap_info at sys_swapoff needs to
be updated to also explain why reading p->frontswap_map outside the lock
is safe at that point, like it does for p->prio and p->swap_map.)
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@...arb.net
cesar.barros@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists