[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ehpuqam8.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:38:47 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "peterz\@infradead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo\@elte.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"mtosatti\@redhat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"avi\@redhat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
"raghukt\@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <raghukt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"jeremy\@goop.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"vatsa\@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"hpa\@zytor.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] kvm,x86: RCU based table free
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:48:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> wrote:
>
> I am also interested in introducing HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE on x86 for Xen.
> Maybe we can pull our efforts together :-)
>
> Giving a look at this patch, it doesn't look like it is introducing
> CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE anywhere under arch/x86.
> How is the user supposed to set it?
>
I am doing that in the next patch only for KVM-ParavirtTLB flush, as
there is a bug in this implementation that patch [7/7] fixes.
Refer following thread for details:
http://mid.gmane.org/1337254086.4281.26.camel@twins
http://mid.gmane.org/1337273959.4281.62.camel@twins
Regards
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists