linux-kernel - Re: init: multi param parsing regression since 3.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878vg2k3wy.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:47:49 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Benoît Thébaudeau 
	<benoit.thebaudeau@...ansee.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: init: multi param parsing regression since 3.4

On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:39:27 -0700, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: module_param: stop double-calling parameters.
> > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> 
> Rusy, should I take this (with the ubi/build.c part removed) from the
> email - along with the initcall debug printk removals - or can I just
> expect to get a pull request with these things?
> 
>                 Linus

I like to spin this stuff for a day through linux-next, which should be
happening right now.

But if you want to save me the trouble of a pull request, sure.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/