[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18630.1338903474@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:37:54 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, kyle@...artin.ca, dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Crypto keys and module signing
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> As the signature would be stored as an extended attribute, we wouldn't
> need to pass it. Unfortunately not all filesystems have xattr support,
> nor do all of the package installation mechanims. The benefit of
> storing the signature as an extended attribute, however, is that there
> is a consistent mechanism for verifying file data integrity for all
> files, not only ELF.
We also want to be able to do module signature verification with CONFIG_IMA=n.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists