linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FCE40C3.5040902@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:24:19 -0300
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)

Em 05-06-2012 14:17, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:26:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 06/04/2012 08:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There will be no linux-next release tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Changes since 20120604:
>>
>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> drivers/edac/amd64_edac_inj.o: In function `amd64_remove_sysfs_dbg_files':
>> amd64_edac_inj.c:(.text+0x420): multiple definition of `amd64_remove_sysfs_dbg_files'
>> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.o:amd64_edac.c:(.text+0x3d60): first defined here
>> make[3]: *** [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.o] Error 1
> 
> Doesn't trigger on latest linus. But Mauro has a bunch of patches
> touching these parts, can you try reverting if it is in linux-next, the
> one below:
> 
> commit faf20d4e226c53a963c384d36d8aa82c77be6dfb
> Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
> Date:   Wed Mar 21 14:00:44 2012 -0300
> 
>     amd64_edac: convert sysfs logic to use struct device
>     
>     Now that the EDAC core supports struct device, there's no sense
>     on having any logic at the EDAC core to simulate it. So, instead
>     of adding such logic there, change the logic at amd64_edac to
>     use it.
>     
>     Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@...hat.com>
>     Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>
>     Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
>     Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
> 
> Thanks.
> 

It is probably just a Kconfig issue. I'll prepare a patch fixing it,
posting it soon.

Thanks,
Mauro

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/