linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] scsi_debug: Add "removable" parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120605173930.GO3043@piware.de>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:39:30 +0200
From:	Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@...ntu.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Zeuthen <zeuthen@...il.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] scsi_debug: Add "removable" parameter

Randy Dunlap [2012-06-05  9:16 -0700]:
> so why not make it a bool instead of an int value?

Just like the obsolete printk KERN_ERR and the overly long lines (see
my intro mail) I wanted to be consistent with the existing boolean
options (the other flags also use an int).

However, I don't mind much either way; if it is preferred, I can
send a patch with int → bool.

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/