linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:02:25 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	david@...g.hm, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, hughd@...gle.com, sivanich@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet

I'm coming back to this email thread, because I didn't apply the
series due to all the ongoing discussion and hoping that somebody
would put changelog fixes and ack notices etc together.

I'd also really like to know that the people who saw the problem that
caused the current single patch (that this series reverts) would test
the whole series. Maybe that happened and I didn't notice it in the
threads, but I don't think so.

In fact, right now I'm assuming that the series will eventually come
to me through Andrew. Andrew, correct?

                       Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/