[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338925555.2749.33.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:45:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan Dan De Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or
nmi
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 21:43 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> My idea of the stateful hotplug is to have a state which just gets rid
> of the interrupts, timers and some other crap (mostly IPIs) but allows
> an ad hoc resurrection of the cpu.
>
> Ideally the state transition would be driven by the load-balancer.
>
No that's retarded.. Just make it a proper idle state, don't go muck
about with hotplug from the load-balancer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists