[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANKRQnj5mxHLprMt4VMMa7sCwLZb=PAktnVVD1MZVkkUG4eLoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:48:20 +0900
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
I understand your saying. Looks good.
However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.
thanks.
tomoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists