[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:30:23 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench: add new benchmark subsystem and suite "futex
wait"
Em Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:39:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> I'd rather not split it from the main perf binary, if embedded
> wants a small static binary (do they really?) we could add
> support for minimal builds of perf, with just a few [even one]
> subcommand activated or so.
The plan is to be able to do a:
make -C tools/perf menuconfig
And all the other *config make targets as the kernel, using Kconfig
files, etc.
So that we can pick and choose which subset of tools and features one
wants.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists