[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:56:55 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] affs: stop using lock_super
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
The VFS's 'lock_super()' and 'unlock_super()' calls are deprecated and unwanted
and just wait for a brave knight who'd kill them. This patch makes AFFS stop
using them and use the buffer-head's own lock instead.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
---
fs/affs/super.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/affs/super.c b/fs/affs/super.c
index 4ceec56..da7498d 100644
--- a/fs/affs/super.c
+++ b/fs/affs/super.c
@@ -31,13 +31,14 @@ affs_commit_super(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
struct buffer_head *bh = sbi->s_root_bh;
struct affs_root_tail *tail = AFFS_ROOT_TAIL(sb, bh);
- lock_super(sb);
+ lock_buffer(bh);
secs_to_datestamp(get_seconds(), &tail->disk_change);
affs_fix_checksum(sb, bh);
+ unlock_buffer(bh);
+
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
if (wait)
sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
- unlock_super(sb);
}
static void
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists