[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:11:05 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] edac: Do alignment logic properly in edac_align_ptr()
The logic was checking the sizeof the structure being allocated to
determine whether an alignment fixup was required. This isn't right;
what we actually care about is the alignment of the actual pointer that's
about to be returned. This became an issue recently because struct
edac_mc_layer has a size that is not zero modulo eight, so we were
taking the correctly-aligned pointer and forcing it to be misaligned.
On Tile this caused an alignment exception.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
---
Mauro, I assume you will push this through your tree? I am also happy
to push it through the tile tree. Let me know!
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index 10f3750..de5ba86 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
else
return (char *)ptr;
- r = size % align;
+ r = (unsigned long)p % align;
if (r == 0)
return (char *)ptr;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists