[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120607040345.089064266@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:04:36 +0900
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [ 60/82] ext4: force ro mount if ext4_setup_super() fails
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
commit 7e84b6216467b84cd332c8e567bf5aa113fd2f38 upstream.
If ext4_setup_super() fails i.e. due to a too-high revision,
the error is logged in dmesg but the fs is not mounted RO as
indicated.
Tested by:
# mkfs.ext4 -r 4 /dev/sdb6
# mount /dev/sdb6 /mnt/test
# dmesg | grep "too high"
[164919.759248] EXT4-fs (sdb6): revision level too high, forcing read-only mode
# grep sdb6 /proc/mounts
/dev/sdb6 /mnt/test2 ext4 rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3592,7 +3592,8 @@ no_journal:
goto failed_mount4;
}
- ext4_setup_super(sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
+ if (ext4_setup_super(sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
+ sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
/* determine the minimum size of new large inodes, if present */
if (sbi->s_inode_size > EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists