lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:14:07 +1000
From:	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC:	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark INTx masking support of Chelsio T310 10GbE
 NIC as broken

On 06/06/12 00:38, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-25 16:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
>> it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
>> is masked. Mark this adapter as broken so that pci_intx_mask_supported
>> won't report it as compatible.
>>
>> Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
>> ---
>>
>> Alexey, please test if this catches your case correctly.
> 
> Alexey? Ping for testing.


Sorry, was in vacation and then a bit busy.
Yes, that works, thanks. It just a device ID is wrong, should be 0x0030 rather than 0x0010 in your patch - may be 0x10 is broken too, I do not know, mine is 0x30 :)

Here:

>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CHELSIO, 0x0010,
>> +			quirk_broken_intx_masking);




> 
> Jan
> 
>>
>>  drivers/pci/pci.c    |    3 +++
>>  drivers/pci/quirks.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/pci.h  |    2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 8f16900..3a1aeb5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -2876,6 +2876,9 @@ bool pci_intx_mask_supported(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  	bool mask_supported = false;
>>  	u16 orig, new;
>>  
>> +	if (dev->broken_intx_masking)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>>  	pci_cfg_access_lock(dev);
>>  
>>  	pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &orig);
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> index 2a75216..151e174 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> @@ -2929,6 +2929,18 @@ static void __devinit disable_igfx_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0102, disable_igfx_irq);
>>  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x010a, disable_igfx_irq);
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Some devices may pass our check in pci_intx_mask_supported if
>> + * PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE works though they actually do not properly
>> + * support this feature.
>> + */
>> +static void __devinit quirk_broken_intx_masking(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	dev->broken_intx_masking = 1;
>> +}
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CHELSIO, 0x0010,
>> +			quirk_broken_intx_masking);
>> +
>>  static void pci_do_fixups(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_fixup *f,
>>  			  struct pci_fixup *end)
>>  {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 17b7b5b..c7cfd73 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -324,6 +324,8 @@ struct pci_dev {
>>  	unsigned int    is_hotplug_bridge:1;
>>  	unsigned int    __aer_firmware_first_valid:1;
>>  	unsigned int	__aer_firmware_first:1;
>> +	unsigned int	broken_intx_masking:1;	/* device's INTx masking
>> +						   support is not working */
>>  	pci_dev_flags_t dev_flags;
>>  	atomic_t	enable_cnt;	/* pci_enable_device has been called */
>>  
> 


-- 
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ