[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS58YPAOYcHYkXu7hW-DeGRXkFqoF1cLarJFfh0eNfFaVHyBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:53:24 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-exec-assign-endio-before-queue-dead-check
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
>>> One more thing to consider is, the completion function is called from
>>> the same calling context here. As far as my check, it looks ok. Let me
>>> know if you think otherwise.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean.
>
> If there is no error, then the completion routine is called in a
> different context - rq completion context. But here, we call the
> completion routine in the same context of the caller.
Ah, okay. I think the only problem there would be that the end_io
callback is being called outside queue lock. Can you please take care
of that too?
> blk-exec.c: In blk_execute_rq_nowait(), if the queue is dead, call to
> done() routine is not made. That will result in blk_execute_rq() stuck
> in wait_for_completion(). Avoid this by initializing rq->end_io to
> done() routine before we check for dead queue.
Yeah, sounds about right.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists