lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:54:21 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use test_and_clear_bit() instead atomic_dec_and_test() for stop_machine On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:19 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes: > > >> The down side to this is that it adds 4 more bytes on a 64bit > >> machine. (sizeof(unsigned log) == 8 and sizeof(atomic_t) == 4) > > Another patch without additional 4bytes. This simply change > atomic_dec_and_test() to atomic_xchg(). > If nobody picked this up, you might want to resend it with my acked-by. (The second patch, not the first). As patches added to replies are usually ignored. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists