[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zk8fgsx9.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:20:18 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Use atomic_xchg() instead atomic_dec_and_test() for stop_machine
stop_machine_first is just to see if it is first one or not. In this
usage, atomic_dec_and_test() makes value less than 0.
I think it is not desirable, because it only triggers
atomic_dec_and_test() less than 0 debug patch. (the patch tests result
of atomic_dec_and_test() is < 0)
So, this uses atomic_xchg() instead.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c~stop_machine-use-atomic_xchg arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
--- linux/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c~stop_machine-use-atomic_xchg 2012-05-23 13:10:03.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-hirofumi/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c 2012-05-23 13:10:03.000000000 +0900
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static int __kprobes stop_machine_text_p
struct text_poke_param *p;
int i;
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stop_machine_first)) {
+ if (atomic_xchg(&stop_machine_first, 0)) {
for (i = 0; i < tpp->nparams; i++) {
p = &tpp->params[i];
text_poke(p->addr, p->opcode, p->len);
_
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists