[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD0AF72.9040003@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:41:06 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <jslaby@...e.cz>, <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)
On 06/07/2012 01:52 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> No, it works fine.
>
> Not really. You happen to be lucky. Anyway with no tty port the UML code
> will soon cease to function completely so a solution of some sort is
> needed.
>
This is what I understood. That mainline code moved so far that the current
UML driver was too far behind to properly function and *completely* broke.
If only breakage with new UM-TTY code is old util-linux. And we have a
ready made patch for it.
Would you please reconsider, and point the util-linux users to the fixing
patch.
Because as it stands:
Current code:
util-linux - works
FC12-17 - Broken (Patch *not* available)
Debain based - works
New code:
util-linux - Broken, patch available
FC12-15 - Works (with issues)
Debain based - works
So it is not like I'm sacrificing util-linux People
completely, but I am totally sacrificing FC People by
not committing.
Please reconsider, unless you have a patch for me for FC systems
that I can apply so I can use the old code.
Thanks again for everything, so far
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists