[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120607024022.GI21357@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:40:22 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC:blk-exec-call-completion-if-queue-dead [was Q:
blk_execute_rq_nowait() doesn't call completion in case of dead queue
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:24:35PM -0700, Muthu Kumar wrote:
> How about this change?
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
> index fb2cbd5..6bf5c0b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-exec.c
> +++ b/block/blk-exec.c
> @@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct ge
> if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> rq->errors = -ENXIO;
> - if (rq->end_io)
> - rq->end_io(rq, rq->errors);
> + if (done)
> + done(rq, rq->errors);
> + else if (rq->end_io) //XXX Not sure if this check and end_io
> + rq->end_io(rq, rq->errors);
> return;
> }
>
> Only one driver - sx8.c, doesn't set done() function and every one
> else expects done() to be called with error.
Looks like the bug there is rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments
happening after the queue_dead check. Just move the two lines before
queue_head check?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists