[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD0D7AA.4010506@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:32:42 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)
Am 07.06.2012 18:37, schrieb Alan Cox:
> Yes I know exactly what is going on. However getting a more tolerant
> behaviour is going to take a couple more kernels.
>
So, then please tell me what's the proper way to fix the UML console driver?
- tty_port plus ->hangup() works only with a patched util-linux
- tty_port without ->hangup() seems to work only if *getty does not call vhangup()
Thanks,
//richard
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists