[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120607182615.39877547@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:26:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)
> What about the not nice ways?
> Having a ugly driver until 3.7 is better than having no driver...
If you are willing to go do the work then yes.
> I'm wondering why does drivers/tty/vt/vt.c work?
> Can't I model the UML driver after it?
Possibly although the vt driver has its own locking model to watch out
for.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists