linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm: frontswap: split frontswap_shrink further to eliminate locking games

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120607182856.GZ9472@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:28:56 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc:	konrad@...nok.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.magenheimer@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm: frontswap: split frontswap_shrink further to
 eliminate locking games

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 01:37:17PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:30 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > 
> > On Jun 6, 2012 6:55 AM, "Sasha Levin" <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Split frontswap_shrink to eliminate the locking issues in the
> > original code.
> > 
> > Can you describe the locking issue please?
> 
> I may have worded that wrong, it's less of an "issue" and more of a
> complicated code to deal with locking, specifically the extra local
> variable to keep track whether we are locking or not.

So "simplying the locking"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/