lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120607215942.GA13592@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:59:42 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen/blkfront: Add BUG_ON to deal with
 misbehaving backends.

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:16:29AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > The blkfront_remove part is .. that is going to take some surgery to do
> > and I don't think I am going to be able to attempt that within the next couple
> > of weeks. So lets put that on the TODO list and just do this one?
> 
> OK
> 
> > >From 4aabb5b44778fc0c0b8d4f5a2e2cd8e8490064d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:34:51 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] xen/blkfront: Add WARN to deal with misbehaving backends.
> > 
> > Part of the ring structure is the 'id' field which is under
> > control of the frontend. The frontend stamps it with "some"
> > value (this some in this implementation being a value less
> > than BLK_RING_SIZE), and when it gets a response expects
> > said value to be in the response structure. We have a check
> > for the id field when spolling new requests but not when
> > de-spolling responses.
> > 
> > We also add an extra check in add_id_to_freelist to make
> > sure that the 'struct request' was not NULL - as we cannot
> > pass a NULL to __blk_end_request_all, otherwise that crashes
> > (and all the operations that the response is dealing with
> > end up with __blk_end_request_all).
> > 
> > Lastly we also print the name of the operation that failed.
> > 
> > [v1: s/BUG/WARN/ suggested by Stefano]
> > [v2: Add extra check in add_id_to_freelist]
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > index 60eed4b..c7ef8a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > @@ -144,11 +144,22 @@ static int get_id_from_freelist(struct blkfront_info *info)
> >  static void add_id_to_freelist(struct blkfront_info *info,
> >  			       unsigned long id)
> >  {
> > +	BUG_ON(info->shadow[id].req.u.rw.id != id);
> >  	info->shadow[id].req.u.rw.id  = info->shadow_free;
> > +	BUG_ON(info->shadow[id].request == NULL);
> >  	info->shadow[id].request = NULL;
> >  	info->shadow_free = id;
> >  }
> 
> Like Jan said, it would be best to change the two BUG_ON into WARN_ON
> and return an error.

Yes. I missed that.
> 
> 
> > +static const char *op_name(int op)
> > +{
> > +	const char *names[BLKIF_OP_DISCARD+1] = {
> > +		"read" , "write", "barrier", "flush", "reserved", "discard"};
> > +
> > +	if (op > BLKIF_OP_DISCARD)
> > +		return "unknown";
> > +	return names[op];
> > +}
> 
> Considering that op is an int, shoudn't we check for negative values
> too?

Yes! I also converted this per Jan's excellent idea.

Please see:


>From 3877611c3096423a7741e99e9c9b9e63a9f2e557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:34:51 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] xen/blkfront: Add WARN to deal with misbehaving backends.

Part of the ring structure is the 'id' field which is under
control of the frontend. The frontend stamps it with "some"
value (this some in this implementation being a value less
than BLK_RING_SIZE), and when it gets a response expects
said value to be in the response structure. We have a check
for the id field when spolling new requests but not when
de-spolling responses.

We also add an extra check in add_id_to_freelist to make
sure that the 'struct request' was not NULL - as we cannot
pass a NULL to __blk_end_request_all, otherwise that crashes
(and all the operations that the response is dealing with
end up with __blk_end_request_all).

Lastly we also print the name of the operation that failed.

[v1: s/BUG/WARN/ suggested by Stefano]
[v2: Add extra check in add_id_to_freelist]
[v3: Redid op_name per Jan's suggestion]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
---
 drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c     |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h |    6 ++++
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
index 2f22874..ae8e3b7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
@@ -141,14 +141,33 @@ static int get_id_from_freelist(struct blkfront_info *info)
 	return free;
 }
 
-static void add_id_to_freelist(struct blkfront_info *info,
+static int add_id_to_freelist(struct blkfront_info *info,
 			       unsigned long id)
 {
+	if (info->shadow[id].req.u.rw.id != id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (info->shadow[id].request == NULL)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	info->shadow[id].req.u.rw.id  = info->shadow_free;
 	info->shadow[id].request = NULL;
 	info->shadow_free = id;
+	return 0;
 }
 
+static const char *op_name(int op)
+{
+	static const char *names[] = {
+		[BLKIF_OP_READ] = "read",
+		[BLKIF_OP_WRITE] = "write",
+		[BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER] = "barrier",
+		[BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE] = "flush",
+		[BLKIF_OP_RESERVED_1] = "reserved",
+		[BLKIF_OP_DISCARD] = "discard" };
+
+	if (op < 0 || op >= ARRAY_SIZE(names))
+		return "unknown";
+	return names[op];
+}
 static int xlbd_reserve_minors(unsigned int minor, unsigned int nr)
 {
 	unsigned int end = minor + nr;
@@ -744,20 +763,31 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 
 		bret = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&info->ring, i);
 		id   = bret->id;
+		/*
+		 * The backend has messed up and given us an id that we would
+		 * never have given to it (we stamp it up to BLK_RING_SIZE -
+		 * look in get_id_from_freelist.
+		 */
+		if (id >= BLK_RING_SIZE)
+			/* We can't safely get the 'struct request' as
+			 * the id is busted. So limp along. */
+			goto err_out;
+
 		req  = info->shadow[id].request;
 
 		if (bret->operation != BLKIF_OP_DISCARD)
 			blkif_completion(&info->shadow[id]);
 
-		add_id_to_freelist(info, id);
+		if (add_id_to_freelist(info, id))
+			goto err_out;
 
 		error = (bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_OKAY) ? 0 : -EIO;
 		switch (bret->operation) {
 		case BLKIF_OP_DISCARD:
 			if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
 				struct request_queue *rq = info->rq;
-				printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: discard op failed\n",
-					   info->gd->disk_name);
+				printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
+					   info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret->operation));
 				error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 				info->feature_discard = 0;
 				info->feature_secdiscard = 0;
@@ -769,18 +799,14 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		case BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE:
 		case BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER:
 			if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
-				printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: write %s op failed\n",
-				       info->flush_op == BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER ?
-				       "barrier" :  "flush disk cache",
-				       info->gd->disk_name);
+				printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op failed\n",
+				       info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret->operation));
 				error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 			}
 			if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_ERROR &&
 				     info->shadow[id].req.u.rw.nr_segments == 0)) {
-				printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: empty write %s op failed\n",
-				       info->flush_op == BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER ?
-				       "barrier" :  "flush disk cache",
-				       info->gd->disk_name);
+				printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: empty %s op failed\n",
+				       info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret->operation));
 				error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 			}
 			if (unlikely(error)) {
@@ -813,12 +839,18 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 			goto again;
 	} else
 		info->ring.sring->rsp_event = i + 1;
-
 	kick_pending_request_queues(info);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif_io_lock, flags);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+err_out:
+	WARN(1, "%s: response to %s has incorrect id\n",
+	     info->gd->disk_name, op_name(bret->operation));
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->io_lock, flags);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
 
diff --git a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
index ee338bf..bc75c75 100644
--- a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
+++ b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ typedef uint64_t blkif_sector_t;
 #define BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE   3
 
 /*
+ * Used in SLES sources for device specific command packet
+ * contained within the request. Reserved for that purpose.
+ */
+#define BLKIF_OP_RESERVED_1        4
+
+/*
  * Recognised only if "feature-discard" is present in backend xenbus info.
  * The "feature-discard" node contains a boolean indicating whether trim
  * (ATA) or unmap (SCSI) - conviently called discard requests are likely
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ