[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608005935.GL30000@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 01:59:35 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Subject: Re: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:36:04AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Eric, how about this - if nothing else, that makes code in there simpler
> and less dependent on details of VFS guts:
Argh. No, it's not enough. Why are you using ->d_iput()? You are not
doing anything unusual with inode; the natural place for that is in
->d_release() and then it will get simpler rules wrt setting ->d_fsdata.
As it is, you need to do that exactly after the point where you know
that it dentry won't be dropped without going through d_add().
OK, I've split that in two commits and put into vfs.git#sysfs; take a look
and comment, please. Should get to git.kernel.in a few...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists