| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120608123128.GA18293@elgon.mountain> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:31:28 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com> Cc: drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [patch -resend] drbd: fix resync_dump_detail() output The tests here aren't correct. It should be doing a shift before doing the bitwise AND. (bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES) is always false and (bme->flags & BME_LOCKED) checks for BME_NO_WRITES instead of checking for locked. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> --- I sent this to the drbd-user list in March, but never recieved a response. diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c index 2959cdf..ffe1ee4 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c @@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e) struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce); seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left, - bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------", - bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------" + test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bme->flags) ? + "NO_WRITES" : "---------", + test_bit(BME_LOCKED, &bme->flags) ? + "LOCKED" : "------" ); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists