lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOvdn6VNhi0O9fo7KUOV4Lrux=KBJ75hJOhhtozMPsp0FGB=Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:13:34 -0400
From:	Ben Guthro <ben@...hro.net>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/hvc: Fix polling mode to work with kdb/kgdb

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Ben Guthro <ben@...hro.net> wrote:

<snip>

> +#ifndef CONFIG_XEN
>        /*
>         * Wait for the other CPUs to be notified and be waiting for us:
>         */
>        while (kgdb_do_roundup && (atomic_read(&masters_in_kgdb) +
>                                atomic_read(&slaves_in_kgdb)) != online_cpus)
>                cpu_relax();
> +#endif
>
>        /*
>         * At this point the primary processor is completely


The cpu roundup seems to not be working as expected here.
While I get into the kgdb exception code on the master cpu - none of
the slave cpus ever get into the code that is counting them up.

Ignoring this CPU roundup is useful to get into the kdb code, but
probably not correct.

Does you have any thoughts as to why I might not be getting into this
code under Xen?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ