[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBDWg9Wa_4s7NBeyXy23wh4CFyKzoF83EBEm1a6w=v+KUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 21:37:51 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: [patch] BFS 421: remove global runqueue lock in running tick
We simply deschedule current, with no bother grabbing global lock, since IPI,
if triggered by preempt, could not change our result, like no schedule when
preempt enabled.
preempt_enable_no_resched();
if (unlikely(need_resched()))
goto need_resched;
--- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Wed Jun 6 21:02:50 2012
+++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Fri Jun 8 21:17:24 2012
@@ -2784,11 +2784,13 @@ static void task_running_tick(struct rq
} else if (rq->rq_time_slice >= RESCHED_US)
return;
- /* p->time_slice < RESCHED_US. We only modify task_struct under grq lock */
+ /*
+ * With irq disabled, current is descheduled without global lock
+ * held and IPI cared.
+ */
p = rq->curr;
- grq_lock();
- set_tsk_need_resched(p);
- grq_unlock();
+ if (!test_tsk_need_resched(p))
+ set_tsk_need_resched(p);
}
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists