linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/82] 3.2.20-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:04:06 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ 00/82] 3.2.20-stable review

On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 15:42 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Op 08-06-12 06:18, Ben Hutchings schreef:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.20 release.
> > There are 82 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Jun 10 13:00:00 UTC 2012.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > A combined patch relative to 3.2.19 will be posted as an additional
> > response to this, and the diffstat can be found below.
> Is it too late to nominate patches?
[...]

It's too late for this time, unless there's something really urgent or
needed to avoid some other change in the rc causing a regression.

I'll queue these up after 3.2.20.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)