linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS on SandyBridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBRrpTbe0JOmqq1bNerm5T9739u6Qvuy_x_4acYyzuhdrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:26:04 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	andi@...stfloor.org, mingo@...e.hu, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: check ucode before disabling PEBS on SandyBridge

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:07 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > +static const u32 snb_ucode_rev = 0x28;
>> > +
>>
>> That needs to be a per CPU model value. It
>> is not the same for SNB vs. SNB-EP. On EP
>> it may even depends on stepping.
>
> Yeah, you said, easiest is removing the const and putting some
> assignments to the thing somewhere in our model switch.
>
> Do you know what values for what chip we should use?
>
Checking on that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/