[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608145147.GA15332@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:51:47 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Ron Chen <ron_chen_123@...oo.com>
Cc: Linux Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: memcg cgroup controller & sbrk interaction
On Thu 07-06-12 18:19:07, Ron Chen wrote:
[...]
> However, not only us, but others have found that the memcg controller
> does not cause sbrk(2) or mmap(2) to return error when the cgroup is
> under high memory pressure.
Yes, because memory controller tracks the allocated memory (with page
granularity) rather than address space. So the memory is accounted when
it is faulted in.
> Further, when the amount of free memory is really low, the Linux
> Kernel OOM killer picks something and kills it.
Yes, this is the result of the design when the memory is tracked during
page faults.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg02622.html
>
>
> We also would like to see if it is technically possible for the
> Virtual Memory Manager to interact with the memory controller
> properly and give us the semantics of setrlimit(2).
What prevents you from using setrlimit from inside the group?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists