[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206081641040.3086@ionos>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:51:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:57:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > The log is still huge though. (68M uncompressed) at
> > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/r8169-trace.txt.xz
> >
> > Following that URL gives me a nice picture.
> >
> > This is somewhat embarrassing, isn’t it? :)
>
> indeed ;-) Should be fixed.
I can't find the point where the warning is issued, but I think I
found the cause of the problem.
static void rtl_slow_event_work(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
{
.....
napi_schedule(&tp->napi);
--> __napi_schedule();
--> list_add_tail(&napi->poll_list, &sd->poll_list);
__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
This merily sets the softirq bit.
So this code is really wrong. It's called from full preemptible
context of the workqueue. And if the next thing is a context switch to
idle then the pending softirq check will trigger.
I let the network folks sort out the proper solution.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists