[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqdUpcXdPHaFgjJOdLC2rm=WoVktuNkV_82QR4QaPg=CnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:36:14 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: dan.magenheimer@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] mm: frontswap: trivial coding convention issues
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
>> ---
>> mm/frontswap.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/frontswap.c b/mm/frontswap.c
>> index 557e8af4..b619d29 100644
>> --- a/mm/frontswap.c
>> +++ b/mm/frontswap.c
>> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ int __frontswap_store(struct page *page)
>> inc_frontswap_failed_stores();
>> } else
>> inc_frontswap_failed_stores();
>> + }
>
> This looks wrong. Did you compile it?
gah... yes, I've had an error in the merge resolution, but since that
code is completely changed in next couple of patches I didn't notice
it when building the final version. I really should build after each
merge failure...
Konrad, would it be ok if I send just a new version of this patch (if
everything else is fine)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists