[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw1yLOYzVCWMRUERNPEKgnrOfGNGmU335H_4aqGPLwq0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:27:28 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
codalist@...emann.coda.cs.cmu.edu, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
osd-dev@...n-osd.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, logfs@...fs.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH, RESEND] fs: push rcu_barrier() from
deactivate_locked_super() to filesystems
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Note that module unload is *not* a hot path - not on any even remotely sane
> use.
Actually, I think we've had distributions that basically did a "load
pretty much everything, and let God sort it out" approach to modules.
I know some people *have* actually worried about module load/unload
performance.
Whether it is "remotely sane" I'm not going to argue for, but ..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists