[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339123274.14838.35.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:41:14 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, nzimmer@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Quiet down the boot messages
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 22:15 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> A bunch of bugzillas have complained how noisy the nmi_watchdog is during
> boot-up especially with its expected failure cases (like virt and bios
> resource contention).
Hi Don, this seems nicer.
Just some trivial comments below:
> This is my attempt to quiet them down and keep it less confusing for the end
> user. What I did is print the message for cpu0 and save it for future
> comparisions.
comparisons
[]
> After the change, it is simlified to:
simplified
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
[]
> @@ -377,6 +377,14 @@ static int watchdog_nmi_enable(int cpu)
> struct perf_event_attr *wd_attr;
> struct perf_event *event = per_cpu(watchdog_ev, cpu);
>
> + /*
> + * People like the simple clean cpu node info
> + * on boot. Simplify the noise from the watchdog
> + * by only printing messages that are different than
> + * what cpu0 displayed
> + */
This comment could be shortened by a line
/*
* People like simple and clean cpu node info on boot.
* Reduce the watchdog noise by only printing messages
* that are different from what cpu0 displayed.
*/
> + static unsigned long err0 = 0;
Strictly, this doesn't need initialization.
I think the err0 name is unclear. Maybe cpu0_err instead;
I think the use of !cpu and cpu is unclear.
It's still a cpu, just index 0.
!cpu should be cpu == 0 and
cpu should be cpu != 0 too.
> @@ -390,11 +398,21 @@ static int watchdog_nmi_enable(int cpu)
>
> /* Try to register using hardware perf events */
> event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(wd_attr, cpu, NULL, watchdog_overflow_callback, NULL);
> +
> + /* save cpu0 error for future comparision */
> + if (!cpu)
> + err0 = (IS_ERR(event) ? PTR_ERR(event) : 0);
if (cpu == 0 && IS_ERR(event))
cpu0_err = PTR_ERR(event);
> +
> if (!IS_ERR(event)) {
> - pr_info("enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.\n");
> + /* only print for cpu0 or different than cpu0 */
or if
> + if (!cpu || err0)
if (cpu == 0 || cpu0_err)
> + pr_info("enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.\n");
> goto out_save;
> }
>
> + /* skip displaying the same error again */
> + if ((PTR_ERR(event) == err0) && cpu)
if (cpu > 0 && PTR_ERR(event))
> + return PTR_ERR(event);
>
> /* vary the KERN level based on the returned errno */
> if (PTR_ERR(event) == -EOPNOTSUPP)
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists