[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD177BD.1070004@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:55:41 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some vmevent fixes...
(6/5/12 3:52 AM), Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com> wrote:
>>> - On desktops, apps can drop their caches on demand if they want to
>>> and can avoid swap activity?
>>
>> In this case, fallocate(VOLATILE) is work more better.
>
> For some cases, yes, but probably not for all.
>
> For example, if userspace doesn't know about "about to swap real soon"
> condition, it can continue to grow its caches making
> fallocate(VOLATILE) pretty much useless.
Fair enough. But, Please consider your scenario don't need vmevent(2),
cat /proc/meminfo works enough. Only dropping activity need a quick work
and just in time notification. cache growing limitation don't need.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists