[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALF0-+WsZnEho0-bPonCjPnsUtaMUmMnDwKmrqBsNQW_cO0T+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 09:01:50 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sh: fix compiler warning by properly inlining flat_set_persistent()
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:13:26AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> This patch removes the following warning:
>> fs/binfmt_flat.c:752: warning: unused variable ???persistent???
>> There is neither change in functionality, nor extra code generated.
>>
>> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
>> Cc: <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
>
> That's what the cast was for, with what gcc version did that stop
> working?
Mmm. You're right. I did this change first for m68k [1] and when that
went ok, I decided it
was best to propagate this fix to every other arch.
Originally, my first try was to propagate your cast:
#define flat_set_persistent(relval, p) ({ (void)p; 0; })
to the other arches, that just do:
#define flat_set_persistent(relval, p) 0
But, then someone pointed out that inlining would produce some (nil) code
and it seemed better.
To conclude: sh was the only one doing it right, and there is no good
reason to change
it, except to make code more homogeneous.
Hope it is clear now,
Ezequiel.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/21/491
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists