[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120609092301.GF1761@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:23:01 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
dhillf@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V8 14/16] hugetlb/cgroup: add charge/uncharge calls for
HugeTLB alloc/free
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This adds necessary charge/uncharge calls in the HugeTLB code. We do
> hugetlb cgroup charge in page alloc and uncharge in compound page destructor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c | 7 +------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index bf79131..4ca92a9 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,8 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> BUG_ON(page_mapcount(page));
>
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(hstate_index(h),
> + pages_per_huge_page(h), page);
hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page() takes the hugetlb_lock, no?
It's quite hard to review code that is split up like this. Please
always keep the introduction of new functions in the same patch that
adds the callsite(s).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists