| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:06:59 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Allow calls to rcu_exit_user_irq from nesting irqs
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:55:54AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:46:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Here you go:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/idle
>
> So I've rebased my nohz cpusets patchset and applied these patches.
> During testing I found a bug and realized I need to make rcu_exit_user_irq()
> callable from any irq nesting level.
OK. ;-)
> Here is a fix:
>
> ---
> >From c30610d5ed2c292a87f7e32216c3419cdc12dff0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 14:06:30 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Allow calls to rcu_exit_user_irq from nesting irqs
>
> rcu_exit_user_irq() which exits RCU idle mode after the current
> irq returns has been designed to be called from non nesting irqs
> only.
>
> However the IPI that restarts the tick and exits RCU user-idle mode
> in nohz cpusets can happen anytime. For example it can be a nesting
> irq by interrupting a softirq. In this case the stack of RCU API
> calls becomes:
>
> ==> IRQ
> rcu_irq_enter()
> ....
> do_softirq {
> ===== > IRQ (restart tick IPI)
> rcu_irq_enter()
> rcu_exit_user_irq()
> rcu_irq_exit()
> <=====
> }
> rcu_irq_exit();
>
> Hence we need to make rcu_exit_user_irq() callable from any nesting
> level of interrupt.
>
> rcu_enter_user_irq() is only called from non nesting irqs though. But
> to stay consistant with the new change we also allow it to be called
> from any irq nesting level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 1b0dca2..3e84c4c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -465,11 +465,11 @@ void rcu_user_enter(void)
>
> /**
> * rcu_user_enter_irq - inform RCU that we are going to resume userspace
> - * after the current irq returns.
> + * after the current non-nesting irq returns.
> *
> - * This is similar to rcu_user_enter() but in the context of a non
> - * nesting irq. After this call, RCU enters into idle mode when the
> - * interrupt returns.
> + * This is similar to rcu_user_enter() but in the context of an
> + * irq. After this call, RCU enters into idle mode when the
> + * current non-nesting interrupt returns.
> */
> void rcu_user_enter_irq(void)
> {
> @@ -478,12 +478,9 @@ void rcu_user_enter_irq(void)
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
> - /*
> - * Ensure this irq is a non nesting one interrupting
> - * a non-idle RCU state.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting != DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE + 1);
> - rdtp->dynticks_nesting = 1;
> + /* Ensure we are interrupting a non-idle RCU state */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rdtp->dynticks_nesting & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK));
> + rdtp->dynticks_nesting -= DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE;
This will be broken on architectures that can fail to return from interrupts
and exceptions and vice versa. The resulting value of rdtp->dynticks_nesting
might well go negative, or might fail to reach zero when the outermost
interrupt returns.
One workaround would be to add up the relevant fields of preempt_count()
and assign the result to rdtp->dynticks_nesting.
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> @@ -619,12 +616,12 @@ void rcu_user_exit(void)
>
> /**
> * rcu_user_exit_irq - inform RCU that we won't resume to userspace
> - * idle mode after the current irq returns.
> + * idle mode after the current non-nesting irq returns.
> *
> - * This is similar to rcu_user_exit() but in the context of a non
> - * nesting irq. This is called when the irq has interrupted a userspace
> - * RCU idle mode context. When the interrupt returns after this call,
> - * the CPU won't restore the RCU idle mode.
> + * This is similar to rcu_user_exit() but in the context of an
> + * irq. This is called when the irq has interrupted a userspace
> + * RCU idle mode context. When the current non-nesting interrupt
> + * returns after this call, the CPU won't restore the RCU idle mode.
> */
> void rcu_user_exit_irq(void)
> {
> @@ -633,12 +630,9 @@ void rcu_user_exit_irq(void)
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
> - /*
> - * Ensure this irq is a non-nesting one interrupting
> - * an RCU idle mode.
> - */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting != 1);
> - rdtp->dynticks_nesting = DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE + 1;
> + /* Ensure we are interrupting an RCU idle mode. */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_nesting & DYNTICK_TASK_NEST_MASK);
> + rdtp->dynticks_nesting += DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE;
This one works because all of the interrupt misnesting events that I
know of happen from system-call context, not from idle or from user-mode
execution.
Thanx, Paul
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists