[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120610191654.GE10523@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:16:54 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>,
Dominic Eschweiler <eschweiler@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio_pci_generic does not export memory resources
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:11:30PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:00:36PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > One thing I stand corrected on: assigning a PF that does DMA with VFIO
> > *might* be secure, and sometimes, maybe often, is.
> > There's just no way to make sure.
> > This is unlike uio_pci_generic where it would always be insecure.
>
> You need to be root to access a UIO device, and if you're root, you can
> compromise a system in many ways. Before UIO, people used /dev/mem for
> similar purposes, and UIO is certainly a seccurity improvement over that.
>
> But of course, UIO presents security risks. Like many other things below
> /dev, you need to know what you're doing, and who gets access to /dev/uioX.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
Sorry I might not have explained myself clearly. uio_pci_generic would
be insecure if used with a device doing DMA. I am not speaking
about UIO in general at all.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists