[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120610074752.GA11506@localhost>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:47:52 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-writeback.c: fix update bandwidth time judgment
error
> static void global_update_bandwidth(unsigned long thresh,
> unsigned long dirty,
> unsigned long now)
> {
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dirty_lock);
> static unsigned long update_time;
>
> /*
> * check locklessly first to optimize away locking for the most time
> */
> if (time_before(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
> return;
>
> spin_lock(&dirty_lock);
> if (time_after_eq(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)) {
> update_dirty_limit(thresh, dirty);
> update_time = now;
> }
> spin_unlock(&dirty_lock);
> }
>
> So time_after_eq in global_update_bandwidth function should also change
> to time_after, or just ignore this disunion?
Let's just ignore them. You are very careful and I like it.
Please move on and keep up the good work!
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists