[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120610102252.GA6793@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:22:53 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: fix a race on 32bit arches
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:21:14PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 10:03 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > One question though: do we want to lay the structure
> > out so that the rx sync structure precedes the rx counters?
> >
>
> I am not sure its worth having holes in the structure, since its percpu
> data.
>
> That would be 8 bytes lost per cpu and per device.
Right, I forgot it's per cpu.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists