[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD59AD8.1050109@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:14:32 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
CC: gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Sharp, Sarah A" <sarah.a.sharp@...el.com>,
Alan stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq
On 05/30/2012 03:46 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>>>> Is this needed in my -next tree now? Or is it something for later?
>>>
>>>
>>> Appreciate if it can be in -next tree. :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any reason you did not put Sarah on the To: line here? She's the one
>>>> that needs to ack it before I can accept it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarah, would you like to give some comments here?
>>
>> Looks fine. I'll send a pull request to Greg with this patch after I
>> verify it doesn't generate new warnings.
>>
>
>
> Sarah, any further comments for this patch? :)
Just try on 3.5-rc2 kernel, find it still works.
Sarah, do you mind to give some comments for this?
-------------
>From 6ae1b9e71f9b14be5774ae9c1b4cf57cd4e747ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq
According to Felipe and Alan's comments the second parameter of irq
handler should be 'void *' not a specific structure pointer.
So fix it.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 4 ++--
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 23b4aef..cc8a52f 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ hw_died:
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, struct usb_hcd *hcd)
+irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, void *hcd)
{
return xhci_irq(hcd);
}
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index afdc73e..f7d40c1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_msi(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
return ret;
}
- ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, (irq_handler_t)xhci_msi_irq,
+ ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, xhci_msi_irq,
0, "xhci_hcd", xhci_to_hcd(xhci));
if (ret) {
xhci_dbg(xhci, "disable MSI interrupt\n");
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_msix(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
for (i = 0; i < xhci->msix_count; i++) {
ret = request_irq(xhci->msix_entries[i].vector,
- (irq_handler_t)xhci_msi_irq,
+ xhci_msi_irq,
0, "xhci_hcd", xhci_to_hcd(xhci));
if (ret)
goto disable_msix;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
index de3d6e3..737ef54 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
@@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@ int xhci_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, bool hibernated);
int xhci_get_frame(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
irqreturn_t xhci_irq(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
-irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, struct usb_hcd *hcd);
+irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, void *hcd);
int xhci_alloc_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev);
void xhci_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev);
int xhci_alloc_tt_info(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists