linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/6] mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:17:28 -0400
From:	kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...gle.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy()

From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>

When shared_policy_replace() failure, new->policy is not freed correctly.
The real problem is, shared mempolicy codes directly call kmem_cache_free()
in multiple place.

This patch creates proper wrapper function and uses it.
Note: The bug was introduced pre-git age (IOW, before 2.6.12-rc2).

Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d97d2db..7fb7d51 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2150,12 +2150,17 @@ mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long idx)
 	return pol;
 }
 
+static void sp_free(struct sp_node *n)
+{
+	mpol_put(n->policy);
+	kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+}
+
 static void sp_delete(struct shared_policy *sp, struct sp_node *n)
 {
 	pr_debug("deleting %lx-l%lx\n", n->start, n->end);
 	rb_erase(&n->nd, &sp->root);
-	mpol_put(n->policy);
-	kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+	sp_free(n);
 }
 
 static void sp_node_init(struct sp_node *node, unsigned long start,
@@ -2320,7 +2325,7 @@ int mpol_set_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *info,
 	}
 	err = shared_policy_replace(info, vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_pgoff+sz, new);
 	if (err && new)
-		kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, new);
+		sp_free(new);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -2337,9 +2342,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *p)
 	while (next) {
 		n = rb_entry(next, struct sp_node, nd);
 		next = rb_next(&n->nd);
-		rb_erase(&n->nd, &p->root);
-		mpol_put(n->policy);
-		kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+		sp_delete(p, n);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&p->lock);
 }
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/